Benzin on Friday 16th June 2006, 12:28:50 (#316952) -7 (13)

So they goth both a penis and a vagina? :O reply to this comment

pr0be on Friday 16th June 2006, 13:03:32 (#316988) 4 (10)

yes, goths have always penisses, but they are no goths, i think reply to this comment

liclit on Friday 16th June 2006, 12:30:50 (#316955) (journal) 13 (13)

i need to get to the beach more often reply to this comment

Invisible_Kid on Friday 16th June 2006, 17:05:57 (#317040) -2 (4)

me too ^^ reply to this comment

i8my4k2 on Friday 16th June 2006, 12:37:53 (#316967) 6 (6)

Closed eyes in that position... all you need is tape, and to whisper "just say yes" reply to this comment

brownie (62.158.104.*) on Friday 16th June 2006, 12:42:04 (#316973) 16 (16)

mv /dev/penis /dev/slut reply to this comment

Mike_Stoned on Friday 16th June 2006, 14:00:36 (#317013) (journal) 5 (5)

dd if=/dev/crotch of=/dev/schlong bs=20cm reply to this comment

misterblackula on Friday 16th June 2006, 15:33:02 (#317029) (journal) 6 (6)

but first: touch slut, chmod slut 666 reply to this comment

Mike_Stoned on Sunday 18th June 2006, 02:28:12 (#317197) (journal) 1 (1)

awww... no "execute" rights? so I guess you only want to do a book discussion with her? penpals? ...and pssst, it's 'chmod <mode> <file>', IT guys like you should know. ;) reply to this comment

Dono on Sunday 18th June 2006, 19:26:03 (#317236) (journal) 1 (1)

Don't forget that the mode should be octal... reply to this comment

misterblackula on Monday 19th June 2006, 08:26:08 (#317249) (journal) 0 (0)

*excecutes -f option on both of you* then runs comments | cat > dev/null :-P reply to this comment

Heepo on Wednesday 28th June 2006, 06:30:18 (#318312) 0 (0)

man woman reply to this comment

poo'nwee on Friday 16th June 2006, 12:50:42 (#316977) 1 (3)

The one and only computer scientist who have had sex ever! (Or at least have the chance to) reply to this comment

surgeonbob on Friday 16th June 2006, 13:03:58 (#316989) (journal) 4 (4)

thems aint no scientitsts reply to this comment

jiz on Saturday 17th June 2006, 06:42:05 (#317091) 0 (4)

And neither are you, obviously :D reply to this comment

guimonkey (67.69.21.*) on Friday 16th June 2006, 12:54:34 (#316981) 7 (9)

reading Unix books put me to sleep as well reply to this comment

Bionic-Badger on Friday 16th June 2006, 15:54:28 (#317035) (journal) 2 (4)

No doubt the books were to put them to sleep. On another note, the only unix geek girls I've seen have been nasty fat ones. reply to this comment

guimonkey (69.195.79.*) on Friday 16th June 2006, 22:43:39 (#317071) -1 (3)

[+] for thinking the same thing at the same time reply to this comment

painfull on Friday 16th June 2006, 17:15:36 (#317041) (journal) 5 (5)

reading Unix books put me in the mood to get nekkid as well reply to this comment

Rhino420 on Friday 16th June 2006, 18:37:56 (#317051) 3 (5)

To bad reading UNIX doesnt make your tiny boobs grow. reply to this comment

Osquip on Friday 16th June 2006, 19:38:57 (#317056) (journal) 3 (5)

Aww! I want one! I'm good enough for her! I almost know Pascal! reply to this comment

RevoLveR on Friday 16th June 2006, 20:01:09 (#317063) 1 (1)

smells photoshop reply to this comment

FuerLandundKoenig on Friday 16th June 2006, 21:04:59 (#317066) (journal) 3 (5)

smells fishy reply to this comment

dirkdiggler on Sunday 18th June 2006, 02:06:46 (#317194) 0 (2)

smells like teen spirit - I'm not buying it reply to this comment

sparrow# on Friday 16th June 2006, 21:07:21 (#317067) -3 (3)

where s the gag, i dont get it reply to this comment

Mike_Stoned on Saturday 17th June 2006, 02:19:15 (#317081) (journal) 5 (5)

Windows users are not supposed to get it. Never mind. reply to this comment

High0ctane (84.140.153.*) on Sunday 18th June 2006, 07:07:46 (#317206) 1 (1)

*sigh reply to this comment

traviz on Saturday 17th June 2006, 01:06:47 (#317079) 3 (3)

umount /mnt/panties reply to this comment

Marcato on Sunday 18th June 2006, 16:45:31 (#317233) -1 (1)

Geek girls are sexy. reply to this comment

Technochick on Tuesday 15th August 2006, 20:18:05 (#324628) 0 (0)

Thanks! reply to this comment