Sunday 07 September 2008, 11:37:53                Your Ad Here
site navigation
news
jihad
b0gcams
pr0n
fun images
offensive shit
misc stuff
fan stuff
all posts
archives
b0g ezine
user stats
search
post bump
sex dot php
words
irc quotes
photoshop
user journals
forum

user options
login
signup
lost password

Sponsors


top referers
sickestsites
phun
entensity
ostfrallan
fuckaliciousporn
idlearmy
uniquepeek
Bizarre Videos
hotpornstar
indienudes
hotpornstars
heaven666
annihilationx
retnuh
toxicfactory
monkeyfilter
link-factory
theweirdstuff
dagimp
dr-zeller
top100
kontraband
c
hawtbabes
livevideo
all referrers

b0g poll
My sex life consists of:
women
men
trannies
my pet
my nieghbours pet
I'm married, I don't have sex
masterbation
little girls
little boys
furries
any kind of machinary (especially the washing machine during spin cycle)
other (please explain in detail)
27 comments | suggest
users online
7 members - 69 guests
Iron Fist cuntlicker Trizzle hates germans the hermit integral brownmullet hellcomes2frogt own

what they doing






 
Are you fast enough to...

...to break world information transmission record?

Quote:
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT, Chiyoda Ward, Tokyo, President and CEO is Norio Wada) has successfully demonstrated the ultra-large capacity optical transmission of 14 Tera bits per second (Tera is one trillion) over a single 160 km long optical fiber. The value of 14 Tbps (111 Gbps x 140 ch) greatly exceeds the current record of about 10 Tbps and so claims the record of the world's largest transmission capacity.


To whoever 14 terabits per seconds seems big, it's not. If you throw 200Gb HDD, and it is flies through the air for about 1 second, when another nerd catches it, the total information transmission speed will be 200 * 1e-3 * 8 = 1.6 terabits per second. But this is not what a b0gger would find interesting, right? Besides, breaking a record this way may turn out somewhat expensive, so here is what you could do instead.

Human genome has 3 120 000 000 complementary pairs, half of that is in your sperm - 1 560 000 000. Every pair is either A-T or G-C, and also can have one of two directionsso we have 4 possible values, or 2 bits. The number of sperm cells wasted when you jerk off, ranges from 50 to 500 millions (we will use 200 000 000 in our calculations). An average time of male orgasm is about 5 seconds. Total amount of information transmitted over these 5 seconds is 1.56e9 * 2e8 * 2 bits, so our typical performance is 124 800 terabits per second. That is much better, and much more fun to do.

The author of this idea (someone nicknamed Kamichu) probably holds unofficial world information transmission champion title, but do not let that stop you from trying to beat the record. You can do it, go champ!
posted by makc on Friday 7th December 2007, 07:05:22read 1178 times

back | previous | next | post comment

r0XX0r on Friday 7th December 2007, 07:20:09 (#59110) (journal)
4 (4)
lets hack some humans and fill them with pr0n. Fastest servers ever!
reply to this comment

krustyDC (62.224.171.*) on Friday 7th December 2007, 07:57:15 (#59115)
1 (1)
have fun "downloading" it...
reply to this comment

BentJohnson on Friday 7th December 2007, 08:53:02 (#59120)
My sperm isn't wasted, they willingly sacrifice themselves so that they may have 47 virgin ovum in paradise.
reply to this comment

dumm_german on Saturday 8th December 2007, 18:37:33 (#59230)
it was 100 when I singed in !
reply to this comment

Trogdor the Burninator on Friday 7th December 2007, 09:46:36 (#59130) (journal)
Un-related?
reply to this comment

makc on Friday 7th December 2007, 09:55:22 (#59132) (journal)
http://www.chameleonnews.com/year2003/mar2003/calyptratus/male1.j pg
reply to this comment

Gooch_Rash on Friday 7th December 2007, 13:42:23 (#59151) (journal)
no tits....zzz
reply to this comment

surgeonbob on Friday 7th December 2007, 15:42:49 (#59159) (journal)
you just did a calculation describing the data throughput of masturbation. you win.
reply to this comment

yettti activist on Friday 7th December 2007, 16:04:35 (#59161) (journal)
i tried really hard to read this but i couldn't pay attention
reply to this comment

TheThirdCross on Friday 7th December 2007, 20:54:11 (#59169) (journal)
that shit looks like my homework... which i'm not doing right now for a reason.
reply to this comment

Bionic-Badger on Saturday 8th December 2007, 01:30:49 (#59184) (journal)
Yeah, but I think you end up transmitting mostly the same information in each... er... "packet", so the actual useful information throughput is lower. I'm not a biologist though.
reply to this comment

junga on Saturday 8th December 2007, 04:25:50 (#59188)
2 (2)
200 * 1e-3 * 8 = 1.6 terabits per second


omg no the units!!!!1
reply to this comment

liclit on Saturday 8th December 2007, 08:41:46 (#59196) (journal)
i beat "it" all the time
reply to this comment

B0gology on Sunday 9th December 2007, 18:35:25 (#59292)
How about I take a shit in your mouth? How many terabits is that?
reply to this comment


powered by wsnm v0.85 | rss.php
page generated in 0.3616 seconds; executed 6 queries
time in php: 0.1356 (37%) - time in mysql: 0.226 (63%)
/server us.undernet.org - #b0g 15 posts pending approval © b0g.org
contact: tress - k-rad-bob