So this morning i turn on the radio, only to hear that now the UK wants to
change rules on what they consider to be a rape.
Apparently men are taking advantage of women whilst their drunk, then these
women wake up the next day and think, hmmm I shouldnt have done that
maybe... So therefore it's rape.
fuck that. women should be responsible for thier own actions. Just because
these women go out, and get so fubarred that they dont understand what they
do the night before is hardly ground rules for a rape charge. Instead these
women should learn to drink a bit more responsibly and not shag the first
dick that buys them more alcohol.
This forces all responsibility off females and puts everything onto the
male....Maybe making women sign a consent form wasnt such a stupid idea
after all. But then they would be able to claim we forced them to sign that
as well, or forged their signatures.
This whole blame issue will only result in women becoming even more
careless, not only that, the term 'rape' is now altered
completely, to suit everyone but the men they sleep with.
these dumb bitches claiming rape after consenting to sex should be
subjected to a proper rape after their claim, to show them what a real rape
is like.
How far does consent have to go?
Unrelated:
posted by tikklemynuts on Tuesday 7th March 2006, 05:42:02
The bigger the tits, the more equal rights--just more equal than yours.
It's a gay community conspiracy, they already took over Hollywood,
most militaries and made major inroads in governments.
I don't go around flaunting my hetrosexuality, I have a dick so I
dress and act like a man, never had a hetro-pride parade day or anything of
the sort. So why should they?
The golden rule is: It's not rape if they don't say no. Unless
they are asleep or something... But the point is, if women agree to sex it
doesn't matter whether they are drunk or not, they agreed. If they
don't want to be in that situation, don't get pissed. Simple.