Monday 01 December 2008, 10:11:03                Your Ad Here
site navigation
news
jihad
b0gcams
pr0n
fun images
offensive shit
misc stuff
fan stuff
all posts
archives
b0g ezine
user stats
search
post bump
sex dot php
words
irc quotes
photoshop
user journals
forum

user options
login
signup
lost password

Sponsors


top referers
entensity
phun
sickestsites
fuckaliciousporn
uniquepeek
stileproject
Bizarre Videos
idlearmy
hotpornstar
indienudes
hotpornstars
theweirdstuff
annihilationx
link-factory
heaven666
all referrers

b0g poll
I've cum in a measuring cup, do I get...
4 oz
8 oz
12 oz
16 oz
20 oz
24 oz
32 oz
36 oz
41 comments | suggest
users online
6 members - 68 guests
fetus_from_the_ ashes mamuka b3ni SSkunK Monty winjard

what they doing






 
90days

Thank goodness some MPs have sense and saved us from this ridiculous bill. But 28 days is still far to long. I only hope the first time this comes into court the judge isn't in someone's pocket.

This isn't about 'terror'. This is about the state using 'terror' to spread fear throughout the populace and control it so. Ultimate goal: totalitarianism?

Why are we in Iraq 'giving them democracy', while at home, giving ours all up.

Why all of a sudden do we need to give up our freedom to protect it.

What exactly is wrong with our current laws? Why do we now need these absurd, radical new laws giving up our freedom, and liberty, and rights because of so called 'terrorism'.

How can we have a democracy when the state can place anyone it likes in prison for whatever reason they like, without having to tell the person why.

Tony Blair is an immoral, unjust man. He is not fit to serve office and has no right to call himself a Christian.

It makes you wonder how Britain coped with the actual terrorism of the IRA during the '70s, '80s and '90s.

some background;
http://news.bbc.c o.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4422086.stm
posted by tress on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 14:51:52read 976 times

back | previous | next | post comment

liclit on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 14:59:15 (#23615) (journal)
"It makes you wonder how Britain coped with the actual terrorism of the IRA during the '70s, '80s and '90s."

good point
reply to this comment

Azrael on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 15:14:30 (#23618) (journal)
http://www.crappisoft.net
Over in Australia, things are hitting a critically hilarious point. After trying to copy what the American presidents have been doing for the last half century and weilding fear as a weapon on their own populace in order to subjugate the masses and give themselves more power, they actually seem genuinely SURPRISED that all of a sudden there's some anti-Muslim sentiments!

The other week, Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, announced that he, in his words, "had some intelligence that (he), er, didn't have before the weekend" (a phrase that made me rofl just on it's own). This intelligence was to do with a Terror threat. He refused to give any details, where it was from, where the attack will be.
One or two days after, there was, coincidentally, an attempt to pass a legislation that served nothing more than to give the goverment more power, under the label of another Anti-Terror law. I think it has since been refused, us Aussies not being NEARLY as stupid as we look or sound.

The fact that the new legislation was within one or two days of this claim of a threat made me laugh, really really hard.

Note: I'm not a war conspiracy theorist or anything. I just enjoy watching mainstream news once every few weeks for some laughs.
reply to this comment

Fusion on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:05:15 (#23633) (journal)
http://www.b0g.org
I must also laugh, the dood said it wrong, but intelligence also means something like "news" ie. CIA - Central Intelligence Agency has othing to do with the IQ of people.
reply to this comment

Azrael on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:08:09 (#23636) (journal)
http://www.crappisoft.net
Yes, that's what I was pointing out =P
reply to this comment

Fusion on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:33:29 (#23647) (journal)
http://www.b0g.org
I r baboon.
reply to this comment

[skorpion] on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 17:04:54 (#23652) (journal)
http://www.idonthaveanammusingurl.com
The new legislation was passed - and was part of the reason for the raids in melbourne and sydney this week. The new legislation allowed the AFP to arrest people for terrorism when there wasn't a specific target yet.
reply to this comment

RavensClaw on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 17:31:03 (#23658)
Gee...pulling the fuse out of the dynamite before the match is lit....what a concept.
reply to this comment

Azrael on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 18:59:04 (#23660) (journal)
http://www.crappisoft.net
Ah, FUCK!
You're right. I was thinking about a different one.
Yeah, something to add to that legislation, too, for all non-Aussies: If arrested (abducted!) and taken into custody, questioned (or as close to actual torture as we're allowed), interrogated...
You're not allowed to talk about it afterwards, and it's up to you to create your own alibi for what you did during the time you were in custody.

That's right, the burden of suppression of information is on YOU. Or you get arrested =P
reply to this comment

RavensClaw on Thursday 10th November 2005, 14:02:10 (#23707)
1 (1)
Or lets see how you deal with getting a phone call that your brother just went up in flames in the World Trade Center as you watch it crash to the ground on the telly and you get to go tell your mother and his wife and children that he's never coming home and there's a good chance we wont find his body. Then you can come lecture me on militant Islamic rights and principals in ALL nations.
reply to this comment

Azrael on Thursday 10th November 2005, 15:18:07 (#23718) (journal)
http://www.crappisoft.net
-2 (2)
What the hells has that got to do with anything I said, you idiotic troll?!
reply to this comment

RavensClaw on Friday 11th November 2005, 05:55:04 (#23752)
1 (1)
Is it better to take terror suspects off the streets and save a potentially deadly senario from happening, which by the way bomb making chemicals, components and computers were seized, or do you sit back and let the 9/11 senario play out, shrug afterwards and say "Well...at least their freedom was intact." That's what I'm responding to.
reply to this comment

Ozdog on Thursday 10th November 2005, 13:37:09 (#23701)
http://www.fabric8.com/revolution/images/ghetto_zoom.gif
0 (2)
well in defence of howard..(why i dont know).. but the laws were passed..and 4 days later they arrested 18 guys(sand men) who were plotting to blow up shit..so..has it helped protect us?..or helped us lose more liberties??
reply to this comment

RavensClaw on Thursday 10th November 2005, 14:11:06 (#23708)
1 (1)
No nation now has the luxury of isolationism. The fight's coming to a town near you, so you can either be proactive and alive with some diminished liberties or you can do nothing and die when they bomb your town, but hey you'll be free to rot in peace.
reply to this comment

Azrael on Thursday 10th November 2005, 15:19:46 (#23719) (journal)
http://www.crappisoft.net
-2 (2)
Jamaca, mon. Dey harbour nooo bad feelin's to aaanyone, mon.
reply to this comment

RavensClaw on Friday 11th November 2005, 08:36:15 (#23774)
1 (1)
Two men killed in fourth day of Jamaican violence

KINGSTON, Jamaica (AP) -- Two men were shot dead and a police officer injured in the fourth day of gang-related violence in downtown Kingston.Monday. The violence that started on Friday has now left eight people dead and 11 people injured, police said.
Police said the violence is being waged between gangs in the neighboring communities of Tel Aviv and Matthew's Lane, sparked by the shooting death of a Tel Aviv resident last week. On Monday, two men were killed by several gunmen in the central Kingston area, police said. Constable Wayne Santouse of the Special Anti Crime Task Force was shot and injured by gunmen in west Kingston, police said. He was with a patrol that came under fire from gunmen who then fled on foot, police said. Three police cars also were damaged. There were no arrests. "The areas are still tense but the security forces are present to help put things under control," said police spokeswoman Constable Natasha Green. Military helicopters and soldiers deployed on Sunday were maintaining a presence in the areas, but officials would not say how many were there. A curfew also has been enforced to keep people off the streets after dark. Still, Deputy Police Superintendent James Forbes said the security forces, especially the police, are short by at least 1,000 personnel. Gangs with clashing political loyalties dominate several areas of the city, especially west Kingston, where gunfights flared in May, leaving nearly 100 people dead in three months. Yeah...they sound like real peaceful people.....mon!
reply to this comment

Azrael on Thursday 10th November 2005, 15:22:16 (#23720) (journal)
http://www.crappisoft.net
-2 (2)
18 people, eh?
...Yay? There doesn't HAVE to be ANY proof whatsoever that they were terrorists or even knew anything about terrorism.
reply to this comment

F@C3R4Pe on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 15:27:26 (#23621) (journal)
http://www.opbp.clanpage.de
im glad blair got beat. i hope he goes the same way maggie did as a disgraced snivling little cunt. the laws work fine as they are, we took the best that the irish (which was a lot worse than the muslims have managed thus far and they followed rules) could dish out and hit the ground running. im just worried as to who is going to take over after blair cause that david cameron is a nutter and if the country votes against labour then the torries are gonna win cause despite being the best of a bad bunch the lib dems are never gonna fucking win.

at least its not as bad as in the us were they can hold you indefinatly without access to a lawer. i still blame the yanks for putting all these ideas into blairs head the only thing they could put into it now that would help would be a bullet.
reply to this comment

Thelula on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 15:38:38 (#23623)
Blair and Bush will have blood on their hands for the rest of their lives.
reply to this comment

Death_Tef on Thursday 10th November 2005, 08:56:57 (#23688) (journal)
http://de.geocities.com/laplasmoperato/
and they don't even give a shit. also they will get away with it..
reply to this comment

TheThirdCross on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 15:56:53 (#23627) (journal)
from the American perspective...

we currently have a lot of the same bullshit laws on our books (ie. the Patriot Act), and it is sickening.

...but let us put this into perspective.
right or wrong, the IRA wants England out of Ireland. AlQaida (and similar orginizations) want to destroy the entire christian world.

the US has born the majority of AlQaida's destructive force, but this is starting to change. as other nations around the world begin to feel their bite, we will see more of these kind of laws.

maybe this kind of extreme response is the only way to combat this extremist problem. maybe not. only our grandchildren will know for sure.
reply to this comment

Azrael on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:06:32 (#23634) (journal)
http://www.crappisoft.net
0 (2)
Oh. So those Balinese hotels were bombed because they were filled with christians?
</sarcasm>
reply to this comment

gu3st on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:06:44 (#23635)
-2 (2)
Islam teaches the destruction of the Jewish state and to wipe the Jews off the face of the planet (Christians the same thing). They've been blowing themselves up with nailbombs in Israel long before any US involvment in any Islamic States.

Lol and about Blair as a Christian like Tress said. Acting like it's a good thing or something...
Christians are just as bad as Islam (Muslims) and both copied the Jews who believed in God 2000 (2500 at least before Islam) years before Christianity was even started. If God is omnipotent as is taught then he purposely split man into warring religious states. So either God is a hypocrite and evil or he doesn't exist.

That's all this is about, Bush himself has used religion as a cause for invasion and killing terrorists and the Islamics using Jihad to justify their actions.

Screw you bible thumpers!
reply to this comment

gu3st on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:13:21 (#23638)
0 (2)
I should probably point out that the underlying cause of all of this is religion. If it wasn't to start with it is now.
reply to this comment

RavensClaw on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:13:38 (#23639)
1 (1)
God's bringing Armageddon. You can believe it or not. Sooner or later the pieces are gonna fall into place and it's will NOT be pretty for mankind. So, as a Bible thumper, as you put it, I'll pray for you, but Lucy.....you gone have sum 'splain'in to do when Judgement comes. Sorry about that.
reply to this comment

gu3st on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:25:00 (#23644)
-2 (2)
It's those exact thoughts that are causing this. You insane person!
reply to this comment

RavensClaw on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:40:33 (#23650)
1 (1)
If God is for us...who can be against us?
reply to this comment

RavensClaw on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:44:49 (#23651)
2 (2)
PS This may seem like a religious fight, but really...it's about the oil and wealth. Religion is just a good smoke screen. It's a big dodo sandwich and the worlds getting to take a big,wet bite.
reply to this comment

TheThirdCross on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:14:14 (#23640) (journal)
0 (2)
i'm a heathen (i gave up on religion years ago) and i agree tha christians are, at least, almost as bad as muslims.

but it doesn't really matter what religion you are, it is what religion that the muslim world considers your nation to be that determines whether or not you are a target.
reply to this comment

gu3st on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:24:18 (#23642)
1 (3)
Well I was looking into it and according to Jewish belief Christians and Muslims are just extensions (copy cats) and are false and that the real Messiah (Jesus) has not been born yet, all that according to Jewish belief. Was why the killed Jesus. Islam preaches that the Jews and Christians are real but just intepret the books wrong. Then Christians call Islam flat out false and Jews as real but interpreting the scriptures wrong. It's all a bunch of bullshit if you ask me.

Man... if Zeus was still around he could kick this new age Gods ass around.
reply to this comment

TheThirdCross on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:27:23 (#23646) (journal)
0 (2)
...fo shizzle
reply to this comment

Bionic-Badger on Thursday 10th November 2005, 01:48:54 (#23664) (journal)
3 (3)
Er dude, Islam doesn't teach anything like that. In fact, when Islam was a real, *the* power in the world, it was quite tolerant of other religions (well, at least those that came from Judaism). It was only after the rulers started a more closed-door policy towards the exchange of ideas and tolerance of different ideas that the empire started to crumble.

It's groups like Hamas that want to drive the Jews into the sea.

In all the cases listed above, its the humans who have twisted religious doctrine towards their own motives, not the other way around.
reply to this comment

gu3st on Thursday 10th November 2005, 13:43:14 (#23703)
-2 (2)
You're so wrong it hurts. The destruction of the Jewish state is actually one of the "prophecies" that are supposed to come true in Islamic teachings, before the end of the world. Muslims will kill the Jews wiping them off the face of the planet.

In case you haven't noticed these three pretty major religions are very very hypocritical of themselves. I'm only pointing out facts (according to their scriptures), if their scriptures are facts then those not trying to kill Jews are hypocrits. Get what I'm saying? These religions are piles of bullshiat and no matter how many times they say they're tolerant they aren't. They cause segregation and war. Yeah there might be some interpreting the scriptures in their own ways, but that makes them hypocrits since without that religion they would not understand the concept of God to begin with and these Bibles are supposedly factual.
reply to this comment

RavensClaw on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 15:57:06 (#23628)
1 (1)
As an American, I agree that the current leaders of our respective countries are going off the preverbial deep-end, but they're scared to death that inaction on their part is going to be seen as a green light for terrorist to bring the fight onto their shores on a more frequent basis. So in effect, they see diminished freedom as the answer to fighting domestic terrorism. The world could have rocked on with Saddam as head of Iraq, but after 9/11 the Americans and British needed a Hitler type to point the finger at and say "There's the Evildoer! If we can get him, the problem is solved". All it did was pour gasoline on a smoldering situation and polarized Islamic extremist to further action. Now I love our soldiers and I think they're a brave lot to be in harms way for us, but I'm not sure the ends justify the means anymore. Once you fire the bullet, you can't make it go back down the gun barrell.
reply to this comment

Fusion on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:11:26 (#23637) (journal)
http://www.b0g.org
2 (2)
I agree.
People will never like their politicians. They will always find something wrong.
This is why all that "Dubya is a shithead" stuff pisses me off. People that say stupid phrases like this should also say what they think should be done. What did those stupid Kerry voters think? That Kerry is a non-war dickhead that will take all soldiers back and say sorry to Iraq? Bullshit! We live in a fucked up world, so just go out, have some beer and fine sex.
reply to this comment

gu3st on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:20:56 (#23641)
-2 (2)
Hitler was raised Roman Catholic and as Christian teachings taught to hate the Jews for killing Jesus that's what he grew up with and when he started the killing guess who he made sure to try and exterminate?

Now we've a very very religious president killing Islamics which according to Christian belief is a false religion and Islamics using the excuse, Jihad for their actions.

It's really kind of scary, as a lot of Americans are Christian they've been trying to chop that line that seperates Church and State, we'll end up going back in time much like the Dark Ages. The Islamics have no seperation of church and state and look at them now? Islam is the Government.
reply to this comment

TheThirdCross on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:24:53 (#23643) (journal)
0 (2)
...most of us americans are behind killing muslims because we don't want to see more of our skyline turn to dust.
reply to this comment

gu3st on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:27:15 (#23645)
0 (2)
We're coming very close to either bringing church and state together or keeping it seperate. That's why our fore-fathers attempted to keep Religion out of politics.
reply to this comment

RavensClaw on Wednesday 9th November 2005, 16:37:22 (#23649)
1 (1)
Nazi doctrine attacked any form of religion,Christian or otherwise, so that arguement is junk. Hitler saw a sect of society that had wealth during the worst of the Depression and used the deperation of the German people at that time as a license to steal from Jews and kill them off. They need an enemy from within, so they could deal with the losing of WWI as not being a military defeat, but a struggle of ideologys; Christian vs.Jew. Hitler then replaced that struggle so that National Socialism was the new religion vs. Judism, because Nazism could embrace the hate doctrines Christianity was supposed to oppose.
Secondly, there is no doctrine in the US Constitution that proposes separation of Church and State. It only deems that there will be no Official religion of state, like Nazism was to Germany or the Church of England to the British. Give Americans a little credit for intellect, although we haven't got leaders who are using it right now.
reply to this comment

gu3st on Thursday 10th November 2005, 00:06:12 (#23662)
-2 (2)
You're very very wrong about Christianity in Germany. It was very BIG and well before World War II Hitler himself talked about Christians duties to kill the Jewish swine. No, it wasn't just Hitler. This was what was preached and in hundreds of books all over Germany. I'll quote from this website. Even if you deny that Hitler was a Christian even though he was razed strictly Christian (Roman Catholic) and that anti-jewish beliefs were taught everywhere in Germany. You still can't deny the fact that Christianity was everywhere in Germany.
http://www.nobel iefs.com/Hitler1.htm

"To deny the influence of Christianity on Hitler and its role in World War II, means that you must ignore history and forever bar yourself from understanding the source of German anti-Semitism and how the WWII atrocities occurred."

and as for separation of church and state I was referring to this...

http://www.rationalrevolution.net /articles/history_of_the_separation_of_chu.htm
reply to this comment

Chop Stix on Thursday 10th November 2005, 01:23:39 (#23663) (journal)
http://www.sexnfun.net/
2 (2)
I think what was disputed was not the origin of anti-semitism in Hitler, but Christianity under national socialism.

And you cannot claim Hitler went to catholic church every sunday. It is known that he introduced new rites for baptism and marriage where people showed allegiance and pronounced their wows to the Führer and not to any Christian God.
reply to this comment

YoDaaah on Thursday 10th November 2005, 04:25:18 (#23669) (journal)
http://www.joecartoon.com
2 (2)
the future is dark..
reply to this comment

mrbear on Thursday 10th November 2005, 05:00:22 (#23671) (journal)
http://teddybearblog.blogspot.com
1 (3)
Vote conservative.
reply to this comment

RavensClaw on Thursday 10th November 2005, 13:46:00 (#23704)
2 (2)
Boy I hate to be a spoil sport,but....Hitler turned away from Christianity in his early teens and sought his destiny in the occult. He later joined with associates who also embraced those teachings and together they built a state guided by the same occultic principals and goals in todays New Age groups. Hitler first made contact with occultists Goerg Lanz Von Leiberfels and Guido Von List after coming across there occult-racist magazine "Ostara" in Vienna in 1909. Both Lanz and List were obsessed with blood purity, the Jewish threat, Holy GRail Legends(Lanz started a cult called the "Order of New Templars" that imitated the traditions of Occultic Grail lore) and a New World Order. Both embraced the backward Swastika as a central symbol, borrowing it from Hindu mysticism. NOt only did Hitler regard Christianity as a defective, failed enterprise, he saw himself as replacing both its God and its Christ. German youth were indoctrinated from birth to pray to Hitler, who they were taught was sent from Heaven to protect them. Nazi approved sermons in German churches proclaimed "Adolf Hitler is the voice of Jesus Christ." And to quote Adolf himself, " If Jehovah has lost all meaning for us Germans, the same must be said of Jesus Christ, his son... He[Jesus] certainly lacks those characteristics which we would require to be a true German. Indeed, he is as disappointing, if we read the record correctly, as is his father, the God of Isreal according to Christian tradition." I got lots more here.
reply to this comment

Fusion on Thursday 10th November 2005, 16:13:45 (#23726) (journal)
http://www.b0g.org
2 (2)
Thanks to this w now have "Indianna Jones and The Holy grail"
reply to this comment

RavensClaw on Friday 11th November 2005, 08:42:53 (#23777)
1 (1)
As Hollywood-stupid as it is, they actually got that one right. Hitler was combing the globle for magical relics to help in his fight for world domination.
reply to this comment

  • by FUCKYOUHIPPy on Monday 19th December 2005, 09:16:30

  • powered by wsnm v0.85 | rss.php
    page generated in 0.1787 seconds; executed 6 queries
    time in php: 0.1045 (58%) - time in mysql: 0.0742 (42%)
    /server us.undernet.org - #b0g 11 posts pending approval © b0g.org
    contact: tress - k-rad-bob